In response to the COVID pandemic, legal professionals challenged long-held traditional models and embraced technology as never before. Similarly, law firms are now viewing generative AI as a way to increase efficiency, with tasks such as drafting and interpreting contracts, preparing and analyzing discovery, and creating legal arguments for briefing to be affected by the use of generative AI.
However, although integrating this technology into everyday legal practice, is novel loud warning bells are already sounding. In the United States lawsuits have offered sobering warnings that generative AI must be used with great caution. In researching and drafting court submissions: Numerous instances of “hallucination” have occurred—where the generative AI creates false information that is authoritatively presented. OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT, acknowledges that the chatbot
“sometimes writes plausible-sounding but incorrect or nonsensical answers.”
Importantly wholesale reliance on generative AI to perform legal research and writing without critical analysis, professional judgment and strategic considerations arising from years of legal educationAI and the Possibilities for the Legal Profession — and Legal Education and experience can give rise to serious ethical issues, together with potential claims of legal malpractice from clients adversely affected by the use of this technology.
Source: Best Lawyers
Leave a Reply