Australian legaltech company Habeas AI-powered platform is reshaping how legal professionals engage with Australian case law and legislation, offering far more than just efficiency—users report improved legal reasoning and deeper insights.
Traditionally cautious in adopting technology, the legal profession is now embracing Habeas as it addresses one of its most time-consuming tasks: research. Founder Will McCartney notes that Habeas doesn’t just speed up the process—it enhances the quality of legal analysis by removing mechanical barriers and uncovering connections that traditional databases often miss.
Unlike keyword-based tools, Habeas understands legal principles semantically. It retrieves not just matching terms but substantively relevant cases, even when those use different language. For instance, a search on “unconscionable conduct” will surface cases engaging with that principle, regardless of exact phrasing. It also goes further by synthesising this information into memo-style summaries with pinpoint citations, allowing users to verify claims with a single click.
To counter concerns about AI hallucinations, Habeas ensures every output is backed by verified citations to judgments and legislation. This verification has reassured many users, particularly in light of past incidents involving unreliable AI-generated legal content.
Time savings are substantial—early adopters report cutting research time by 40–50%—but the platform’s broader impact lies in expanding access to legal knowledge. It enables practitioners to explore unfamiliar areas of law quickly, making firms more agile and responsive. For sole practitioners and barristers, it offers critical support under tight deadlines, especially when preparing urgent court submissions.
A standout feature of Habeas is its exclusive focus on Australian law, distinguishing it from global competitors. Its local specificity has attracted strong interest from major firms now trialling the platform.
Ultimately, Habeas represents a shift in legal culture—towards embracing AI not as a replacement for legal judgment, but as a tool to enhance it. Firms and practitioners can explore the platform via a demo or free trial through its website.
source: Lawyers Weekly
Leave a Reply